aarnâ
0%
Loading
Technology

Infrastructure for
Regulated Tokenized Assets

Built around a single constraint: every asset on the platform has to be tokenized and satisfy IFSCA regulatory requirements at the same time. No compromise on either.

ERC-3643 permissioned tokensONCHAINID identity claimsMulti-signature NAV attestationERC-7540 asynchronous vault
Standards

The standards underneath

Compliance is a property of the instrument here, not a process wrapped around it. Four standards carry that: one for the token, one for the identity that may hold it, one for the price it is carried at, and one for how capital moves in and out.

ERC-3643

Permissioned tokens

All aarna tokenized assets are issued as ERC-3643 permissioned digital tokens. The standard enforces compliance at the token level: transfers execute only between wallets holding valid identity claims. The compliance layer is built into the token contract itself, not bolted on around it.

In practice: an ICT token cannot be transferred to an unverified wallet. Secondary trading, when enabled, respects the same identity and jurisdiction rules as primary issuance. Selected transfer and eligibility controls are programmable and auditable.

What the standard enforces
  • Token-level compliance
  • Identity-gated transfers
  • Programmable eligibility
  • Auditable controls
ONCHAINID

Decentralised identity

Investor identity is managed through ONCHAINID, a decentralised identity standard integrated with ERC-3643. On completing Sumsub KYC, identity claims are issued on-chain - accredited status, jurisdiction, AML clearance - portable across any ERC-3643 asset aarna issues.

Attestation

Independent NAV

ICT's net asset value is certified on a defined cycle, aligned with the reporting cadence of the underlying funds, and published onchain through a multi-signature attestation process, so pricing is transparent and independently verifiable.

ERC-7540 · ERC-4626

Asynchronous vault

Subscriptions and redemptions run through an ERC-7540 asynchronous vault, built on the ERC-4626 tokenized vault standard. A subscription or redemption is submitted as a request and settled in a separate step, rather than exchanged instantly in a single transaction. That matches how the underlying works: capital is invested into, and realised from, funds that price on a defined cycle.

In practice: an investor's request is queued, priced at the net asset value for that cycle, and then settled, with ICT minted to or burned from their wallet. Instant deposit and withdrawal are disabled by design. Because the vault follows the ERC-4626 interface, wallets, custodians and integrators can read it the way they read any standard vault.

What the vault enforces
  • Request-based subscriptions
  • Pricing at each cycle's NAV
  • Windowed redemptions
  • No instant exit
Security

Controls of record

The platform has completed internal smart-contract and application security reviews. An independent penetration test and external smart-contract audit are scheduled before launch.

L1Data
AES-256 encryption
Encrypted at rest and in transit, keys held in AWS KMS.
Private by default
Personal data stays masked; every access is time-boxed and logged.
L2Access
Least-privilege access
Scoped roles, with two-person approval on sensitive actions.
Unchangeable audit trail
Every action recorded in tamper-proof, append-only ledgers.
L3Build and infrastructure
Secure by build
Signed releases, automated code and dependency scans, and security testing in the release pipeline.
Hardened infrastructure
TLS everywhere, and no public data stores.
AI at aarnâ

The intelligence layer across aarnâ

aTARS is aarnâ's agentic layer, operating across investor interaction, platform operations and continuous monitoring. Actions stay bounded by defined permissions, controls and auditable workflows.

ATARS

Three functional areas, each with a defined job and an explicit status.

Live

Operational orchestration

Prepares, simulates, validates and reconciles workflows across the token lifecycle, reducing manual coordination while preserving deterministic controls and an auditable trail.

Every prepared transaction is simulated, checked against the guardrails, its invariants verified and its reconciliation confirmed before it is proposed for signing. The same discipline runs over the NAV attestation pipeline.

Live

Intelligent investor interaction

Understands the product, its structure and the investor's own position, answering questions and assembling relevant information and workflows in context.

It answers how ICT works, where a subscription has reached and when the next distribution falls, at the point the investor asks rather than after a ticket has sat overnight. Where something needs a person, it hands over with the full context already assembled.

In development

Continuous monitoring

Continuously observes infrastructure, transaction states and the underlying portfolio between reporting dates, reporting the findings to the team.

Not built yet - credit decisions over the underlying stay with the funds' authorised, SEBI-regulated managers.

Security review

Seven-round agentic audit

Before mainnet, the ICT contract suite was audited by two agentic methods: a four-round split-pass audit with 12 specialist agents per round, then a three-pass adversarial re-review by Claude Fable 5. Findings were gated against documented invariants; all were fixed in code and verified against the full test suite, bar one made redundant by a refactor.

4 × 12
Method 1

Split-pass audit

Configuration
4 sequential rounds × 12 specialist agents
Scope
All 23 contracts
Gating
Findings de-duplicated and gate-evaluated against documented invariants
44findings
3 × 12
Method 2

Claude Fable 5 adversarial re-review

Configuration
12-agent adversarial panel × 3 passes
Scope
All 23 contracts re-reviewed from scratch, plus every remediation from the split-pass audit
Gating
Re-reviews the remediations themselves, not just the original code
17further findings
Split-pass specialist agents
  • Math and precision
  • Access control
  • Economic security
  • Execution trace
  • Invariants
  • Periphery
  • First principles
  • Asymmetry
  • Boundary
  • Gap hunting
7
Audit rounds
4 split-pass + 3 adversarial
23
Contracts in scope
Token, vault, oracle, distribution, identity, compliance
61
Findings raised
All remediated or superseded
0
Open
Verified against the full test suite
What the code now enforces
11 themes

The fixes cluster into 11 architectural themes, each a property the code now enforces uniformly.

3 themes
Upgrades and system

Who can change the contracts, and how safely they change.

  • UUPS upgrade safety
  • System-contract protection
  • Operational safety
2 themes
Token and compliance

Every movement of the token follows the compliance rules.

  • Token-compliance binding
  • Forced-transfer and recovery state machine
2 themes
Identity

Only verified holders, and admin rights kept tight.

  • KYC verification
  • Identity-layer privilege control
2 themes
Vault and NAV

Subscriptions, redemptions and pricing always add up.

  • Vault accounting integrity
  • NAV oracle precision
2 themes
Distribution

Payouts settle correctly, for every holder.

  • Distribution settlement safety
  • Distribution-share griefing

1,397 Foundry unit, fuzz and invariant tests passing at sign-off, each fix backed by its own proof-of-concept and regression tests.

Internal agentic audit. Independent external smart-contract audit and penetration test scheduled before launch. Findings summary (work-email access).

Roadmap

Under evaluation

Neither of these is committed. Both depend on institutional demand rather than on a date.

Under evaluation

Deeper DeFi composability

Subject to institutional demand.

Under evaluation

Multi-chain deployment

Extending beyond Ethereum to chains with institutional adoption.